B | 95% CI | p value | |
---|---|---|---|
Model 1: Total primary care scores | |||
Reference | 15.8 | 15.1, 16.4 | |
Facility F | 2.3 | 1.6, 3.1 | < 0.001 |
Upper Neno | 0.9 | 0.4, 1.4 | < 0.001 |
Self-rated health = good | 1.1 | 0.3, 1.3 | < 0.001 |
Duration of contact > 4 years | 0.8 | 0.6, 1.7 | 0.001 |
Education >at least secondary | −0.8 | −1.3, −0.2 | 0.011 |
Self -rated health = very good/excellent | 0.9 | 0.2, 1.6 | 0.013 |
Acute presentation | −0.6 | −1.1, − 0.1 | 0.017 |
Male sex | 0.5 | 0.03, 1.0 | 0.036 |
Unadjusted R2 | 12.1% | ||
Adjusted R2 | 10.9% | ||
Model 2 First contact access dimension scores | |||
Reference | 2.9 | 2.9, 3.1 | |
Facility F | 0.8 | 0.8, 1.0 | < 0.001 |
Facility G | −0.8 | −0.8, −0.6 | < 0.001 |
Facility H | −0.6 | −0.6, − 0.4 | < 0.001 |
Facility I | − 0.3 | − 0.3, − 0.1 | 0.001 |
chronic condition | −0.2 | − 0.2, − 0.1 | 0.003 |
Cost of travel >MK500 | 0.1 | 0.1, 0.3 | 0.047 |
Unadjusted R2 | 30.1% | ||
Adjusted R2 | 29.4% | ||
Model 3 Comprehensiveness of services available dimension sum scores | |||
Reference | 2.0 | 1.9, 2.2 | |
Upper Neno | 0.9 | 0.7, 1.1 | < 0.001 |
Facility B | 1.2 | 1.0, 1.5 | < 0.001 |
Facility C | −1.2 | −1.5, −1.0 | < 0.001 |
Facility D | −1.1 | − 1.4, −0.9 | < 0.001 |
Facility F | −0.9 | − 1.1, − 0.7 | < 0.001 |
Education >at least secondary | − 0.2 | − 0.4, − 0.1 | 0.002 |
Travel time > 1 h | 0.2 | 0.03, 0.3 | 0.012 |
Self -health rating = very good/excellent | 0.1 | 0.01, 0.2 | 0.04 |
Unadjusted R2 | 26.1% | ||
Adjusted R2 | 25.2% |