Skip to main content

Table 5 The impact of waiting for treatment for musculoskeletal conditions on health outcomes

From: Reducing wait time from referral to first visit for community outpatient services may contribute to better health outcomes: a systematic review

Study

Outcome

MICD

Findings (Positive MD favours shorter wait)

Statistical Significance

Clinical Significance

Amato et al (1997) [45]

QOL (FOTO Outcomes Index)

Unable to estimate

Patients treated within 15 days had greater improvement in QOL

?

?

Patient Satisfaction (FOTO Patient Satisfaction Index)

Unable to estimate

No association between patient satisfaction and waiting time

N

N

Linton et al (1993) [49]

Pain (Treatment outcome questionnaire)

Unable to estimate

No sig. difference between groups

N

N

Workplace participation

≥ 1 day

History of MSP: No sig. differences

N

N

Number of days off work each quarter

 

No History of MSP:

  
  

1st Quarter: MD 11 (95%CI 0.01-22.0)

Y

Y

2nd Quarter: MD 7 (95%CI -2.7-16.7)

N

N

3rd Quarter: MD 11 (95%CI 2.8-19.2)

Y

Y

4th Quarter: MD 5 (95%CI -4.7-14.7)

N

N

Development of chronic symptoms (proportion & RR)

Unable to estimate

History of MSP: No sig. differences

N

N

No History of MSP: Short wait 2% vs. long wait 15%, RR 8.2 (95%CI 1.5-45.3)

Y

?

Patient Satisfaction (Treatment satisfaction questionnaire)

Unable to estimate

Short wait group more satisfied with time to appointment (X2=15.8, P<0.01 with history of MSP, X2=9.4, P=0.02 with no history)

Y

?

No sig. differences between groups in satisfaction with examination & treatment

N

N

Nordemann et al (2006) [51]

Pain

    

 BRPP (change scores)

1.2 units

MD 0.10 (95%CI -1.0 to 1.2)

N

N

 ŐMPSQ (change scores)

11.7 units

MD 6.3 (95%CI -8.1 to 20.7)

N

N

Function: RMQ (change scores)

3.5 units

MD -0.9 (95%CI -1.0 to 1.2)

N

N

Workplace participation: ŐMPSQ (change scores)

1.1 units

MD -0.7 (95%CI -1.7 to 1.3)

N

N

Pedersen et al (2017) [55]

Function (SPPB)

Unable to estimate

G 0.10 (95%CI -0.1 to 0.2)

N

N

Self et al (2000) [52]

Function (TOAS)

Unable to estimate

No sig. differences between groups.

N

N

Wand et al (2004) [53]

Function (RMQ)

3.5 units

MD 1.8 (95%CI -0.4 to 4.0)

N

N

Pain (VAS)

3.5 units

MD 0.9 (95%CI -0.04 to 1.8)

N

N

Anxiety symptoms (STAIS)

2 units

MD 2.8 (95%CI 1.0 to 4.6)

Y

Y

Depressive symptoms (MZDRS)

5.7 units

MD 8.4 (95%CI 3.9 to 12.9)

Y

Y

QOL

    

 EQ-5D Total Score

0.15 units

MD 0.10 (95%CI 0 to 0.2)

N

N

 SF-36 Physical Function

9.5 units

MD 3 (95%CI -4.8 to 10.8)

N

N

 SF-36 Role-Physical

21.5 units

MD 11 (95%CI -6.7 to 28.7)

N

N

 SF-36 Bodily Pain

11 units

MD 11 (95%CI 2.3 to 19.7)

Y

Y

 SF-36 General Health

9.5 units

MD 12 (95%CI 5.2 to 18.8)

Y

Y

 SF-36 Vitality

10.5 units

MD 22 (95%CI 13.7 to 30.3)

Y

Y

 SF-36 Social Functioning

12.5 units

MD 16 (95%CI 6.4 to 25.6)

Y

Y

 SF-36 Role-Emotional

21.5 units

MD 19 (95%CI 2.7 to 35.3)

Y

N

 SF-36 Mental Health

12 units

MD 22 (95%CI 13.5 to 30.5)

Y

Y

Zigenfus et al (2000) [54]

Workplace participation

    

 Days away from work

≥ 1 day

Short wait vs. intermediate wait:

MD 0.7 (95%CI 0.4 to 1.0)

Y

N

  

Short wait vs. long wait

MD 2.5 (95%CI 2.0 to 3.0)

Y

Y

 Days of restricted work duties

≥ 1 day

Short wait vs. intermediate wait MD 1.8 (95%CI 1.3 to 2.3)

Y

Y

Short wait vs. long waitMD 5.3 (95%CI 4.4 to 6.2)

Y

Y

  1. MICD Minimum Clinically Important Differences, QOL Quality of Life, FOTO Focus on Therapeutic Outcomes, TOAS Therapeutic Outcomes Assessment System, BRPP Borg Category Scale for Ratings of Perceived Pain, ŐMPSQ Őrebro Musculoskeletal pain Screening Questionnaire, RMQ Roland and Morris disability Questionnaire, Sig Significant, SPPB Short Performance Physical Battery, VAS Visual Analogue Scale, STAIS Spielberger State-trait Anxiety Inventory, MZDRS Modified Zung Self-Rated Depression Score, EQ-5D EuroQOL-5D, SF-36 36-item Short Form Survey, MD Mean Difference, RR Risk Ratio, Y Yes, N No; ? Unable to determine