Skip to main content

Table 4 Selected governance-related outcomes as predicted by participation in CARE’s Community Score Card© (subpopulation analysisb)

From: Creating spaces for dialogue: a cluster-randomized evaluation of CARE’s Community Score Card on health governance outcomes

Outcome Estimate Confidence Interval t P
Trust in health workers −0.11 − 0.22 - -0.00 − 2.04 .049
Power sharing 0.03 −0.27 - 0.32 0.20 .844
Mutual responsibility −0.09 −0.16 - -0.03 −2.97 .005
Negotiated spaces participation 0.68 0.41–0.94 5.18 <.001
Joint monitoring and transparency 0.10 0.01–0.20 2.29 .029
Equity and quality 0.11 0.06–0.16 4.27 <.001
Collective efficacy −0.07 −0.22 - 0.08 −0.99 .331
Outcomes of collective action (direct) 0.13 0.07–0.20 4.02 <.001
Perceived health outcomes of collective action 0.24 0.12–0.35 4.34 <.001
Is the HAC an effective bridge between the health facility and community? −0.00 −0.08 - 0.07 −0.09 .925
Is there a Community Action Group or Safe Motherhood Committee? 0.15 0.07–0.24 3.70 <.001
Does Community Action Group or Safe Motherhood Committee provide maternal and newborn health support? −0.02 −0.06 - 0.03 − 0.70 .490
Community help 0.26 0.04–0.48 2.44 .020
  1. aEstimates were obtained from separate models for each outcome. All models contained the following covariates: religion, ethnicity, current marital status, literacy, number of lifetime live births, wealth index, and nearest health facility providing delivery services
  2. bAmong those women in the intervention areas who reported a meeting in their community
Back to article page

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us