Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Perpetuating harms from isolation among older adults with cognitive impairment: observed discrepancies in homecare service documentation, assessment and approval practices

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
31 Oct 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jason Flatt
18 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dimity Crisp
25 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ingeborg Nilsson
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dimity Crisp
28 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jason Flatt
13 Sep 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ingeborg Nilsson
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Sep 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dimity Crisp
1 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ingeborg Nilsson
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
8 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ingeborg Nilsson
Resubmission - Version 5
8 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
9 Oct 2018 Editorially accepted
20 Oct 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12913-018-3616-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement