Table 4 RBF4MNH impact on crude and effective obstetric care coverage (adjusted analysisa)
Outcome | Estimate | Effect size (%-points) | 95%-confidence interval | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Crude coverage | β3 (baseline vs. midterm) | −4.3 | −11.2—3.4 | 0.28 |
β5 (baseline vs. endline) | 1.2 | −10.0—11.8 | 0.83 | |
Effective coverage (no cut-off) | β3 (baseline vs. midterm) | 4.7 | −1.4—10.8 | 0.13 |
β5 (baseline vs. endline) | 7.1 | −0.1—15.0 | 0.07 | |
Effective coverage (50% cut-off) | β3 (baseline vs. midterm) | 1.7 | −22.2—25.7 | 0.89 |
β5 (baseline vs. endline) | −1.9 | −28.6—24.8 | 0.89 | |
Effective coverage (60% cut-off) | β3 (baseline vs. midterm) | 21.1 | −8.1—50.3 | 0.16 |
β5 (baseline vs. endline) | 31.0 | 5.9—56.2 | 0.02 | |
Effective coverage (70% cut-off) | β3 (baseline vs. midterm) | 25.8 | 1.3—50.4 | 0.04 |
β5 (baseline vs. endline) | 16.4 | −7.9—40.8 | 0.19 | |
Effective coverage (80% cut-off) | β3 (baseline vs. midterm) | 13.1 | −8.7—43.9 | 0.24 |
β5 (baseline vs. endline) | 10.5 | −10.8—31.8 | 0.33 |