Study arm | Baseline | Midterm | Endline | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sampled facilities | |||||||
Sample sizes, n (%) | Intervention | 17 (100) | 18 (100) | 23 (100) | |||
Control | 9 (100) | 12 (100) | 9 (100) | ||||
Proportion of health centres (i.e. not hospitals), n (%) | Intervention | 13 (76) | 14 (78) | 18 (78) | |||
Control | 8 (98) | 11 (92) | 9 (100) | ||||
Proportion of public facilities (i.e. not private non-profit), n (%) | Intervention | 16 (94) | 17 (94) | 19 (83) | |||
Control | 6 (67) | 6 (50) | 6 (67) | ||||
Sampled obstetric cases | |||||||
Sample sizes, n (%) | Intervention | 61 (100) | 106 (100) | 131 (100) | |||
Control | 19 (100) | 51 (100) | 18 (100) | ||||
Observed at health centres, n (%) | Intervention | 27 (44) | 51 (48) | 69 (47) | |||
Control | 8 (89) | 45 (88) | 18 (100) | ||||
Observed at public facilities, n (%) | Intervention | 57 (93) | 103 (97) | 116 (89) | |||
Control | 12 (63) | 21 (41) | 11 (61) | ||||
Sampled women | p-value* | p-value* | p-value* | ||||
Sample sizes, n (%) | Intervention | 1084 (100) | 1141 (100) | 1380 (100) | |||
Control | 628 (100) | 695 (100) | 440 (100) | ||||
Women’s age in years, mean (SD) | Intervention | 25.5 (6.3) | 25.1 (6.1) | 25.2 (6.4) | |||
Control | 25.8 (6.4) | 0.41 | 25.0 (5.9) | 0.64 | 25.5 (6.3) | 0.35 | |
Parity in number of births, mean (SD) | Intervention | 3.3 (2.2) | 2.9 (1.9) | 3.0 (2.0) | |||
Control | 3.3 (2.1) | 0.58 | 3.0 (1.9) | 0.87 | 3.0 (1.9) | 0.94 | |
Distance in km to catchment EmOC facility, mean (SD) | Intervention | 5.8 (3.4) | 5.7 (3.7) | 5.5 (3.5) | |||
Control | 5.6 (3.3) | 0.28 | 5.5 (3.0) | 0.32 | 5.5 (3.2) | 0.96 | |
Household SES by wealth quintilea, mean (SD) | Intervention | 2.9 (1.4) | 2.9 (1.5) | 2.9 (1.4) | |||
Control | 3.1 (1.4) | 0.01 | 3.1 (1.3) | 0.10 | 3.2 (1.4) | < 0.01 | |
Service use at any facility including non-EmOCb, % (95-CI) | Intervention | 90.6 (86.3—93.6) | 94.1 (91.8—95.8) | 94.2 (91.9—95.9) | |||
Control | 88.6 (81.6—93.2) | 0.53 | 97.0 (94.7—98.3) | 0.03 | 96.8 (93.7—98.4) | 0.05 | |
Service use at an EmOC facility in study areab, % (95-CI) | Intervention | 75.4 (65.7—83.1) | 79.2 (69.9—86.2) | 78.7 (69.9—85.5) | |||
Control | 66.2 (47.0—81.3) | 0.32 | 73.8 (56.6—85.9) | 0.49 | 64.0 (41.5—81.7) | 0.14 | |
Service use at catchment EmOC facility b, % (95-CI) | Intervention | 60.3 (46.8—72.4) | 65.2 (52.8—75.9) | 65.4 (54.2—75.2) | |||
Control | 40.6 (24.3—59.3) | .07 | 45.0 (28.5—62.8) | .05 | 38.5 (22.7—57.2) | .01 |