Skip to main content

Table 10 Limitations of the interventions

From: Developing and evaluating clinical leadership interventions for frontline healthcare providers: a review of the literature

Author

Country

Year

Limitations of the interventions

Cleary et al. [38]

Australia

2005

Sustainability of the intervention is challenging

Ferguson et al. [39]

Australia

2007

Difficulty in gaining consent from patient to be observed; skills of observer

Williams et al. [40]

Australia

2009

Too intensive thus affecting motivation and ability to attend all sessions

Travaglia et al. [41]

Australia

2011

Resistance from colleagues to change, and nurse/ midwives taking clinical leadership roles, time constraints

MacPhail et al. [23]

Australia

2015

Time away from clinical duties

Short timeline from progamme implementation and limited evaluation of participants’ leadership knowledge and skills

Leggat et al. [42]

Australia

2016

*

Dierckx de Casterelé[45]

Belgium

2008

*

Miller and Dalton [25]

England

2011

Time away from the clinical setting

Leeson and Millar [26]

England

2013

*

Enterkin et al. [27]

England

2013

Intervention too long

Phillips and Byrne [31]

England

2013

Maintaining momentum generated by the intervention

Castillo and James [32]

England

2013

*

Stoll et al. [33]

England

2011

*

Miani et al. [34]

England

2013

Resistance to change from frontline healthcare providers who did not taking part in the programme. Short period of time to enable change

Runnacle et al. [35]

England

2013

*

Lunn et al. [28]

Ireland

2008

*

McNamara et al. [29]

Ireland

2014

*

Fealy et al. [36]

Ireland

2015

*

Patton et al. [37]

Ireland

2013

*

Pearson et al. [30]

Scotland

2010

Intervention very demanding

Martin et al. [46]

Switzerland

2012

 

Kling [43]

USA

2010

*

Abraham [44]

USA

2011

*

Lekan et al. [24]

USA

2011

Without control group changes cannot be conclusively attributed to the intervention

  1. *represents missing data