Skip to main content

Table 3 Explaining burnout symptoms among hospital employees – results of stepwise multiple linear regression analyses (aggregated and stratified)

From: Explaining burnout and the intention to leave the profession among health professionals – a cross-sectional study in a hospital setting in Switzerland

Dependent or outcome variable:

Burnout symptoms (CBI score 0–24)

Caregivers & nurses (incl. midwives)

Physicians

All health professionals

Total hospital employees

N = 882

N = 235

N = 1441

N = 1840

Beta coeff. (β)

Beta coeff. (β)

Beta coeff. (β)

Beta coeff. (β)

Step 1

Step 2

Step 1

Step 2

Step 1

Step 2

Step 1

Step 2

Independent or exposure variables:

 Temporal workload (number of overtime hours per week 0–10+)

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

−.13*

n.s.

−.09***

n.s.

−.07**

 Physical workload (sum score 0–20)

.20***

.12***

.16*

n.s.

.15***

.07**

.17***

.09***

 Emotional job stress (sum score 0–20)

.26***

.13***

.23***

n.s.

.22***

.09**

.17***

n.s.

 Mental job stress (sum score 0–15)

.25***

.16***

.28***

n.s.

.31***

.20***

.34***

.23***

Intervening or mediating variables:

 Effort-reward imbalance (ERI ratio)

.08*

.17*

.14***

.12***

 Work-life imbalance (sum score 0–20)

.35***

.48***

.35***

.35***

Control variables:

 Sex (male)

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

−.05*

−.06*

n.s.

−.05*

 Age (< 25, 25–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55+)

−.13***

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

−.13***

−.09***

−.13***

−.10***

 Educational level (low, medium, high, very high)

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

−.05*

Adjusted R square

.300

.400

.228

.433

.276

.383

.278

.376

No. cases in model

763

708

204

187

1242

1157

1551

1438

  1. *p ≤ .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001; n.s. = not significant (p > .05)