Rehabilitation benefit |
RC Communication | Overallb | Physicalc | Mentald | ADLe | Socialf |
b | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.25 |
95% CI | −0.09, 0.62 | −0.06, 0.67 | −0.00, 0.61 | 0.01, 0.58 | −0.06, 0.55 |
p-value | 0.145 | 0.097 | 0.053 | 0.044 | 0.112 |
RC Relationship |
b | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.28 | 0.04 | 0.06 |
95% CI | −0.04, 0.73 | −0.05, 0.75 | − 0.06, 0.61 | − 0.28, 0.37 | − 0.30, 0.42 |
p-value | 0.079 | 0.083 | 0.109 | 0.786 | 0.751 |
Continuity of care |
RC Communication | Personal1g | Personal2h | Teami | Cross- boundaryj | |
b | −0.33 | −0.40 | 0.25 | −0.35 | |
95% CI | −0.58, − 0.09 | − 0.71, − 0.09 | −0.06, 0.56 | −0.72, 0.01 | |
p-value | 0.008 | 0.011 | 0.114 | 0.056 | |
RC Relationship |
b | −0.40 | −0.50 | 0.36 | − 0.42 | |
95% CI | −0.67, − 0.13 | − 0.83, − 0.16 | 0.05, 0.68 | − 0.80, − 0.04 | |
p-value | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.024 | 0.030 | |
- Abbreviations: RC relational coordination, NCQ-N Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire- Norwegian version, b unstandardised estimated regression coefficient, CI confidence interval, ADL activities of daily living
- aBased on 18 unadjusted linear mixed effects models with either RC communication score or RC relationship scores as the explanatory variable with team allocation set as the random effect in all models
- bOverall rehabilitation benefit
- cPhysical health benefit
- dMental health benefit
- eActivities of daily living benefit
- fSocial participation benefit
- gNCQ-N personal continuity (‘knows me’)
- hNCQ-N personal continuity (‘shows commitment’)
- iNCQ-N team continuity (within somatic rehabilitation)
- jNCQ-N cross boundary continuity (between rehabilitation centres and general practitioner in the municipality)