Skip to main content

Table 6 DCE results for the random effects logit model without interactions

From: Underlying determinants of health provider choice in urban slums: results from a discrete choice experiment in Ahmedabad, India

Choice of profile (0 = base profile; 1 = alternative profile)

Regression Coefficient (95% CI)

Standard Error

Independent variables

Δ PROVIDER_PRIVATE

Private instead of public provider

−0.17 (− 0.62–0.58)

0.31

Δ PROVIDER_TRADITIONAL

Traditional instead of public provider

0.11 (− 0.47–0.69)

0.30

Δ DISTANCE

20 min increase

−0.07* (− 0.10 – − 0.04)

0.01

Δ ATTITUDE

Friendly instead of indifferent attitude

1.81* (1.23–2.40)

0.30

Δ APPROPRIATENESS

Services in line with health requirements instead of not conforming with health requirements

3.42* (2.67–4.18)

0.38

Δ FAMILIARITY

Known doctor instead of unknown doctor

2.85* (2.11–3.59)

0.38

Observations (respondents)

651 (93)

 

Log-likelihood function

− 221.03

 

Wald Chi2

136.34

 

Prob > Chi2

0.00

 

Rho

0.07

0.07

  1. *p < 0.05