Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of TDF determinant mapping across mappers

From: Comparing the application of two theoretical frameworks to describe determinants of adverse medical device event reporting: secondary analysis of qualitative interview data

Determinant themes from AMDE study

TDF domains selected by mappers

LD

ARG

Domain Match

PHYSICIAN BELIEFS

 AMDEs considered expected or unavoidable and not adverse unless outcomes catastrophic; viewed as more severe in other specialties

Beliefs about consequences

Beliefs about consequences

Yes

Social-professional role and identity

No

 AMDEs within 2 years of use were considered unusual

Beliefs about consequences

Beliefs about consequences

Yes

 Views about cause of AMDEs confounded by multiple factors

Beliefs about consequences

No

Knowledge

No

 Incidence of AMDEs has decreased, thus devices were thought to be improved

Beliefs about consequences

No

Optimism

No

Sub-total unique or matching domains

2

3

2/7 (28.6%)

POLICIES, PROCESSES or SYSTEMS

 Follow-up of device-related outcomes beyond short-term results done elsewhere

Environmental context and resources

Environmental context and resources

Yes

Social-professional role and identity

No

 Devices implanted not recorded in patient records

Environmental context and resources

Environmental context and resources

Yes

 No hospital, national or international systems for AMDE reporting

Environmental context and resources

Environmental context and resources

Yes

Reinforcement

No

Knowledge

No

Behavioural regulation

No

Sub-total unique or matching domains

4

2

3/7 (42.9%)

DEVICE MARKET

 Use of specific devices often determined by purchase group contract obligations

Environmental context and resources

Environmental context and resources

Yes

 Lack of responsiveness to AMDEs from industry

Reinforcement

Reinforcement

Yes

Knowledge

No

Optimism

No

Beliefs about consequences

No

Environmental context and resources

No

Sub-total unique or matching domains

5

2

2/6 (33.3%)

Total unique or matching domains

6

5

7/20 (35.0%)