Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Reported use of evidence in clinical practice: a survey of rehabilitation practices in Norway

BMC Health Services Research201818:379

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3193-8

Received: 11 May 2016

Accepted: 8 May 2018

Published: 25 May 2018

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 May 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sharon Mickan
20 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julie Tilson
1 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Moore
Resubmission - Version 2
1 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 May 2018 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Moore
Resubmission - Version 3
3 May 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
8 May 2018 Editorially accepted
25 May 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12913-018-3193-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Regional Center of Knowledge Translation in Rehabilitation, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Oslo/Nesodden, Norway
(2)
Institute for Knowledge Translation, Carmel, USA
(3)
Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
(4)
University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
(5)
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
(6)
Unicare Fram, Rykkinn, Norway

Advertisement