Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Delay in reviewing test results prolongs hospital length of stay: a retrospective cohort study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Oct 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Mei-Sing Ong
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeremy M. Kahn
22 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alberto Freitas
30 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Mei-Sing Ong
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeremy M. Kahn
17 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alberto Freitas
27 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Mei-Sing Ong
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
3 May 2018 Editorially accepted
16 May 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12913-018-3181-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement