Skip to main content

Table 3 Follow-up visit and coverage status, patients with ≥1 uninsured visit within 6 months of intervention

From: Electronic health record tools to assist with children’s insurance coverage: a mixed methods study

 

Intent To Treat (ITT)

Effect of Treatment on the Treated (ETOT)

Intervention clinic patients only

 

Intervention clinic patients

N = 1196

Control clinic patients

N = 384

Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)a

Patients with tool use

N = 232

Patients without tool use

N = 964

Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)a

Returned for ≥1 visit in study period, N (%)

963 (80.5)

324 (84.4)

1.02 (0.77, 1.34)

202 (87.1)

761 (78.9)

1.78 (1.42, 2.23)

 

Intervention patients, with a return visit

N = 963

Control clinic patients, with a return visit

N = 324

Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)a

Patients with tool use, with a return visit

N = 202

Patients without tool use, with a return visit

N = 761

Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)a

Insured by Medicaid at any return visit, N (%)

584 (60.6)

271 (83.6)

0.42 (0.29, 0.61)

130 (64.4)

454 (59.7)

2.00 (0.93, 4.31)

Uninsured at all return visits in study period, N (%)

356 (37.0)

51 (15.7)

2.00 (1.37, 2.94)

67 (33.2)

289 (38.0)

0.49 (0.27, 0.90)

  1. Data source: EHR visit data
  2. BOLD = adjusted odds ratio significantly different from 1.0 (p < 0.05)
  3. Period assessed for uninsured visit = 12/1/2013–11/30/2014, Period assessed for return visits = patient-specific uninsured visit date through 11/30/2015
  4. aLogistic GEE model clustered by clinic; adjusted for sex, age, race/ethnicity, primary language, federal poverty level, Medicaid identification number assigned (Y/N), household member(s) on case (Y/N), length of time household established with clinic, new patient at uninsured visit (Y/N)