Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Impact of a direct-to-consumer information campaign on prescription patterns for overactive bladder

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Jun 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aukje Mantel-Teeuwisse
14 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adrian Wagg
28 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Masayoshi Zaitsu
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aukje Mantel-Teeuwisse
27 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Masayoshi Zaitsu
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aukje Mantel-Teeuwisse
21 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Masayoshi Zaitsu
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Masayoshi Zaitsu
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
25 Apr 2018 Editorially accepted
3 May 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12913-018-3147-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement