Rationing cancer treatment: a qualitative study of perceptions of legitimate limit-setting
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|24 Jan 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amanda Owen-Smith|
|11 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Diana I. Brixner|
|12 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Eli Feiring|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|12 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Feb 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amanda Owen-Smith|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Apr 2018||Editorially accepted|
|9 May 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12913-018-3137-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.