Skip to main content

Table 4 The estimated intention to treat effect (ITTE) of the MSS on rural respondents

From: The spillover effect of midwife attrition from the Nigerian midwives service scheme

Outcomes Antenatal visits Delivery sites
Public sector clinics Private sector clinics No antenatal care Public sector clinics Private sector clinics Home
National
Effect in 2010 0.050*** −0.002 − 0.051*** 0.016 0.002 − 0.013
  (0.016) (0.006) (0.011) (0.011) (0.008) (0.008)
Pre-MSS trend 0.001 −0.001 −0.003 0.002 −0.001 −0.001
  (0.003) (0.002) (0.007) (0.002) (0.001) (0.004)
Observations 25,562 25,065 26,059 26,328 26,401 26,401
R-squared 0.211 0.211 0.338 0.195 0.216 0.376
Northern zones
Effect in 2010 0.053*** 0.003 −0.056** 0.010 0.008 −0.016
  (0.003) (0.003) (0.007) (0.006) (0.007) (0.014)
Pre-MSS trend 0.009 0.0008 −0.009 0.006* −0.001 − 0.006
  (0.011) (0.001) (0.009) (0.002) (0.001) (0.002)
Observations 19,100 19,100 19,474 19,777 19,777 19,777
R-squared 0.251 0.156 0.316 0.161 0.158 0.273
Southern zones
Effect in 2010 0.039 −0.018 −0.026 0.034 −0.021 0.004
  (0.045) (0.017) (0.035) (0.030) (0.020) (0.002)
Pre-MSS trend −0.004 −0.002 0.011 −0.008 −0.001 0.011*
  (0.007) (0.007) (0.022) (0.006) (0.005) (0.004)
Observations 5965 5965 6585 6624 6624 6624
R-squared 0.127 0.164 0.244 0.124 0.159 0.289
  1. Robust standard errors are in parentheses. *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.1 Pre-MSS trend, pre-implementation trend (i.e. the trend in the indicated outcome prior to implementation of the midwives service scheme)