Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Physicians’ and nurses’ thoughts and concerns about introducing neonatal male circumcision in Thailand: a qualitative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Panjasaram Vassie Naidoo
8 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Arleen Leibowitz
8 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Kriengkrai Srithanaviboonchai
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Arleen Leibowitz
28 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Panjasaram Vassie Naidoo
30 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Kriengkrai Srithanaviboonchai
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Kriengkrai Srithanaviboonchai
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
4 Apr 2018 Editorially accepted
11 Apr 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12913-018-3093-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement