Table 4 Logistic regression predicting likelihood of not having DOT at home
Control variable | Odds ratio | Confidence interval | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
Sex | |||
 Female | 1.00 | – | NS |
 Male | 1.28 | (0.89,1.83) |  |
Age (continuous) | 0.98 | (0.96, 0.99) | ** |
Employment | |||
 Employed | 1.00 | – | NS |
 Unemployed | 0.65 | (0.42, 1.01) |  |
Marital status | |||
 Married or cohabiting | 1.00 | – | * |
 Unmarried and not cohabiting | 1.47 | (1.02, 2.11) |  |
Housing quality | |||
 Not in very poor housing | 1.00 | – | ** |
 In very poor housing | 1.84 | (1.13, 2.99) |  |
Education | |||
 Secondary school or higher | 1.00 | – | NS |
 No or only primary school | 1.15 | (0.74, 1.79) |  |
Undergoing retreatment for TB | |||
 No | 1.00 | – | NS |
 Yes | 1.42 | (0.90, 2.27) |  |