Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A qualitative exploration of contextual factors that influence dissemination and implementation of evidence-based chronic disease prevention across four countries

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Oct 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Elizabeth Budd
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tara Tancred
14 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anaïs Tuepker
17 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carolina Ianuale
8 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Elizabeth Budd
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tara Tancred
5 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anaïs Tuepker
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
22 Mar 2018 Editorially accepted
2 Apr 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12913-018-3054-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement