Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Hospitalization outcomes in patients with schizophrenia after switching to lurasidone or quetiapine: a US claims database analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Patricia Soarez
18 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Olubiyi Aworunse
21 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - John Newcomer
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Olubiyi Aworunse
19 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen Chapman
22 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - John Newcomer
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - John Newcomer
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
25 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - John Newcomer
Resubmission - Version 5
25 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
16 Mar 2018 Editorially accepted
4 Apr 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12913-018-3020-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement