Skip to main content

Table 3 Variation between hospitals in the association between hospital quality system development and outcomes for patient safety themes

From: The association between quality system development stage and the implementation of process-level patient safety themes in Dutch hospitals: an observational study

 

Intercept-only model

Quality system (overall)

1: Policy and strategy

2: Human resource management

3: Patient involvement

4: Practice guidelines

5: Systematic quality improvement

Patient Safety themes

Hospital range

ICC

Hospital range

ICC

Hospital range

ICC

Hospital range

ICC

Hospital range

ICC

Hospital range

ICC

Hospital range

ICC

Time-out procedure

16–98

35.9

24–96

27.5

22–97

29.4

19–97

33.2

17–98

35.7

20–97

32.6

20–97

32.3

 - Check patient

74–100

38.3

85–100

26.0

83–100

28.4

*

*

83-100

28.4

*

*

76-100

36.8

 - Check procedure

16–100

51.6

23–100

46.5

20–100

49.0

18–100

50.2

17–100

51.9

18–100

50.7

22–100

47.0

 - Check side/site

79–98

11.6

83–97

7.2

80–98

10.6

80–98

10.6

89–96

1.9

79–98

11.6

79–98

11.4

 - Focus during TOP

18–88

19.8

19–87

18.4

18–88

19.0

18–88

19.8

20–87

17.2

18–89

20.1

18–88

20.1

Contrast- induced nephropathy

22–93

23.1

24–93

21.1

33–90

45.7

22–94

23.3

29–91

17.2

22–94

23.4

22–93

22.7

Pain process indicator 100%

0.4–56

38.9

0.4–55

39.1

0.4–54

38.4

0.4–54

38.9

0.4–52

37.1

0.4–53

37.5

0.4–55

39.0

Medication reconciliation on admission

0.6–96

58.1

0.6–0.96

58.4

0.6–96

58.3

0.5–97

59.4

0.7–95.7

55.9

0.5–97

59.0

0.5–96.8

59.9

Medication reconciliation at discharge

0.1–61

50.7

0.1–56.9

49.1

0.2–47

43.2

0.1–57

49.4

0.1–59

50.9

0.1–52

46.2

0.1–58

49.9

High-Risk Medication

0.8–69

38.9

0.8–68

38.3

0.7–69

39.2

0.9–65

35.9

1.2–60

31.3

0.7–68

38.8

0.7–69

38.9

  1. *there were not enough observations to calculate the associations between Human Resource Management & Practice Guidelines and Check Patient