Skip to main content

Table 1 Reported benefits of MDT meetings in relation to health profession, hospital type, discipline and cancer type being discussed

From: Benefits, barriers and opinions on multidisciplinary team meetings: a survey in Swedish cancer care

 

Frequency of all responses

Nurses/ coordinators

Physicians

P-value

University hospital

County hospital

P-value

Pathology

Radiology

Medicine

Surgery

P-value

Breast cancer

Lung cancer

GI cancer

Uro/Gyn cancer

Other tumors

P-value

Compiled clinical information and review grants accurate treatment recommendations

81%

75%

83%

0.221

78%

84%

0.381

100%

86%

78%

81%

0.278

76%

77%

88%

74%

96%

0.120

Multidisciplinary evaluation

67%

70%

66%

0.732

59%

75%

0.026

57%

68%

69%

67%

0.880

63%

63%

71%

64%

74%

0.830

Promotes adherence to clinical guidelines

34%

30%

35%

0.512

36%

32%

0.550

29%

46%

29%

33%

0.449

35%

29%

36%

31%

39%

0.897

Increases team competence

26%

26%

26%

1.000

34%

19%

0.015

14%

21%

27%

27%

0.702

22%

37%

21%

33%

22%

0.327

Increases patient safety

22%

19%

23%

0.699

24%

20%

0.628

29%

25%

13%

25%

0.274

24%

26%

19%

21%

17%

0.924

Strengthens teamwork

12%

11%

12%

1.000

13%

10%

0.535

43%

7%

9%

11%

0.005

13%

11%

14%

13%

4%

0.833

Training opportunity for junior colleagues

8%

2%

10%

0.073

5%

10%

0.194

0%

0%

15%

8%

0.075

4%

11%

7%

10%

9%

0.781

Shortens time from diagnosis to treatment

14%

28%

9%

< 0.001*

18%

11%

0.240

14%

21%

9%

14%

0.504

13%

14%

14%

18%

13%

0.973

Grants equal care

13%

17%

12%

0.474

13%

13%

1.000

7%

7%

18%

14%

0.494

17%

20%

10%

13%

4%

0.401

Facilitates patient referral between clinics

7%

11%

6%

0.212

4%

10%

0.096

0%

4%

11%

8%

0.442

15%

3%

5%

8%

0%

0.095

Strengthens regional collaboration

4%

0%

5%

0.116

3%

5%

0.719

0%

0%

9%

3%

0.100

2%

6%

2%

3%

13%

0.138

Identification of patients suitable for clinical trials

3%

6%

1%

0.121

0%

5%

0.050

7%

0%

2%

3%

0.559

2%

0%

3%

5%

0%

0.649

Attention to patient preferences

1%

4%

0%

0.056

1%

1%

1.000

0%

0%

0%

2%

0.727

0%

0%

0%

3%

4%

0.217

  1. P-values < 0.05 in bold writing
  2. *P-values that remain significant after applying Bonferroni correction (p < 0.004)