Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of respondents

From: Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: online survey of the potential influence of AGREE II items on overall assessment of guideline quality and recommendation for use

Characteristics

Respondents N = 58 (%)

Profession

 Physician

22 (37.9)

 Physician/methodological expert

10 (17.2)

 Methodological expert

10 (17.2)

 Other

16 (27.6)

Knowledge of the AGREE II instrument

 Yes

51 (87.9)

 No

7 (12.1)

Performance of appraisals using the AGREE I or II instrument

 Yes

49 (84.5)

 No

9 (15.5)

Number of appraised guidelines using the AGREE I or II instrumenta

  < 10 guidelines

27 (46.6)

 10–20 guidelines

9 (15.5)

  > 20 guidelines

13 (22.4)

Experience in yearsa

  < 1 year

6 (10.3)

 1–5 years

35 (60.3)

  > 5 years

8 (13.8)

Involvement in guideline development

 Yes

35 (60.3)

 No

23 (39.7)

Purpose of conducting appraisals using the AGREE I or II instrumentb

 Assessment of guideline quality

24 (41.4)

 Development of guidelines

7 (12.1)

 Writing of guideline synopses

7 (12.1)

 Research

3 (5.2)

 Adaptation of guidelines

2 (3.4)

 Application in clinical practice

2 (3.4)

 Further training

2 (3.4)

 Development of knowledge tools

1 (1.7)

 Publication of scientific articles

1 (1.7)

 Project work

1 (1.7)

 Updating of guidelines

1 (1.7)

 No response

5 (8.6)

  1. aNine survey respondents (15.5%) did not answer this question
  2. bThe question was formulated as an open question; we summarized the response options presented here from the individual responses given. Some of the respondents provided more than one response