This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Risk perception of blood transfusions – a comparison of patients and allied healthcare professionals
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 16 July 2017
Accepted: 12 February 2018
Published: 17 February 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|16 Jul 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|24 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brian Custer|
|5 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Aryeh S. Shander|
|7 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elianna Saidenberg|
|1 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Jan Graw|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|1 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Jan 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brian Custer|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Feb 2018||Editorially accepted|
|17 Feb 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12913-018-2928-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.