This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Application of four-dimension criteria to assess rigour of qualitative research in emergency medicine
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 5 May 2017
Accepted: 6 February 2018
Published: 17 February 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 May 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Roberto Forero|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Timothy Osebe Abuya|
|26 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Francesca Katherine Brundisini|
|26 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amrita .|
|21 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Roberto Forero|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Feb 2018||Editorially accepted|
|17 Feb 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12913-018-2915-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.