Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The benefits of co-location in primary care practices: the perspectives of general practitioners and patients in 34 countries

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Dec 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Manila Bonciani
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maike Tietschert
13 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ling Lin
18 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Manila Bonciani
Resubmission - Version 3
18 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maike Tietschert
30 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Manila Bonciani
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maike Tietschert
1 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Manila Bonciani
Resubmission - Version 5
1 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
6 Feb 2018 Editorially accepted
21 Feb 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12913-018-2913-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement