This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Validation of a core patient-reported-outcome measure set for operationalizing success in multimodal pain therapy: useful for depicting long-term success?
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 14 June 2017
Accepted: 5 February 2018
Published: 17 February 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Jun 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Newcombe|
|8 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chiara Seghieri|
|30 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Carolin Donath|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Newcombe|
|17 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Carolin Donath|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Feb 2018||Editorially accepted|
|17 Feb 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12913-018-2911-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.