This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Improving quality of care through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): expert interviews using the NHS PROMs Programme and the Swedish quality registers for knee and hip arthroplasty as examples
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 22 November 2016
Accepted: 29 January 2018
Published: 7 February 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|22 Nov 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cornelia Van Den Ende|
|14 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joanne Greenhalgh|
|14 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Birgit Prodinger|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cornelia Van Den Ende|
|22 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Birgit Prodinger|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|7 Feb 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12913-018-2898-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.