Experiences from ten years of incident reporting in health care: a qualitative study among department managers and coordinators
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|7 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yang Gong|
|22 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janet E. Anderson|
|30 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Samia Chreim|
|7 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Siw Carlfjord|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Samia Chreim|
|14 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yang Gong|
|22 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Siw Carlfjord|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|14 Feb 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12913-018-2876-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.