This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Evidence to service gap: cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention in rural and remote Western Australia
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 9 February 2017
Accepted: 22 January 2018
Published: 30 January 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Feb 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jos Kraal|
|29 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Louise Maple-Brown|
|18 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Sandra Hamilton|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Louise Maple-Brown|
|9 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Sandra Hamilton|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Sandra Hamilton|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|21 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|22 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|30 Jan 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12913-018-2873-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.