Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Anticipating the potential for positive uptake and adaptation in the implementation of a publicly funded online STBBI testing service: a qualitative analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dan Romer
28 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melissa Kang
19 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Cathy Chabot
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dan Romer
4 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melissa Kang
8 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Cathy Chabot
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Cathy Chabot
Resubmission - Version 4
19 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
22 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
30 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12913-018-2871-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement