This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Anticipating the potential for positive uptake and adaptation in the implementation of a publicly funded online STBBI testing service: a qualitative analysis
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 23 September 2016
Accepted: 22 January 2018
Published: 30 January 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dan Romer|
|28 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Melissa Kang|
|19 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Cathy Chabot|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dan Romer|
|4 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Melissa Kang|
|8 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Cathy Chabot|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Cathy Chabot|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|19 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|22 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|30 Jan 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12913-018-2871-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.