This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Qualitative assessment of the primary care outcomes questionnaire: a cognitive interview study
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 21 February 2017
Accepted: 21 January 2018
Published: 1 February 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Feb 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Constance Dimity Pond|
|11 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lusine Poghosyan|
|14 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Mairead Murphy|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Constance Dimity Pond|
|10 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Mairead Murphy|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|1 Feb 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12913-018-2867-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.