Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Elusive implementation: an ethnographic study of intersectoral policymaking for health

  • Ditte Heering Holt1Email author,
  • Morten Hulvej Rod2,
  • Susanne Boch Waldorff3 and
  • Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen1
BMC Health Services ResearchBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201818:54

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2864-9

Received: 12 January 2017

Accepted: 21 January 2018

Published: 30 January 2018

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David J Hunter
12 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Chinitz
6 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ditte Holt
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David J Hunter
17 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ditte Holt
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
21 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
30 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12913-018-2864-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of Southern Denmark, National Institute of Public Health, Copenhagen, Denmark
(2)
Metropolitan University College, National Research Centre for Disadvantaged Children and Young People, Frederiksberg, Denmark
(3)
Copenhagen Business School, Department of Organization, Frederiksberg, Denmark

Advertisement