This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Elusive implementation: an ethnographic study of intersectoral policymaking for health
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 12 January 2017
Accepted: 21 January 2018
Published: 30 January 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|12 Jan 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David J Hunter|
|12 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Chinitz|
|6 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Ditte Holt|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David J Hunter|
|17 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Ditte Holt|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|30 Jan 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12913-018-2864-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.