This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Acting on audit & feedback: a qualitative instrumental case study in mental health services in Norway
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 3 June 2016
Accepted: 21 January 2018
Published: 31 January 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|3 Jun 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|24 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dunja Dreesens|
|2 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - THOMAS Barnes|
|3 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Cromwell|
|31 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Monica Pedersen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|31 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Cromwell|
|26 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Monica Pedersen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Monica Pedersen|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|18 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|31 Jan 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12913-018-2862-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.