Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Acting on audit & feedback: a qualitative instrumental case study in mental health services in Norway

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Jun 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dunja Dreesens
2 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - THOMAS Barnes
3 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Cromwell
31 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Monica Pedersen
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Cromwell
26 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Monica Pedersen
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Monica Pedersen
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
21 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
31 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12913-018-2862-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement