This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The five-year costs and benefits of extended psychological and psychiatric assessment versus standard intake interview for women with comorbid substance use disorders treated in compulsory care in Sweden
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 7 February 2017
Accepted: 17 January 2018
Published: 30 January 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 Feb 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Shearer|
|5 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brady Horn|
|17 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Tina Olsson|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brady Horn|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|30 Jan 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12913-018-2854-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.