Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Exploring drivers and challenges in implementation of health promotion in community mental health services: a qualitative multi-site case study using Normalization Process Theory

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chung-Ying Lin
21 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Donnelly
12 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Viola Burau
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chung-Ying Lin
27 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jodi Holtrop
25 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Viola Burau
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Viola Burau
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
1 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Viola Burau
Resubmission - Version 5
1 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
16 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
24 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12913-018-2850-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement