Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The relevance of clinical ethnography: reflections on 10 years of a cultural consultation service

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Melissa Dominicé Dao
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Barbara C. Schouten
29 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carol Rivas
5 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Melissa Dominicé Dao
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Barbara C. Schouten
14 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Melissa Dominicé Dao
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Melissa Dominicé Dao
Resubmission - Version 5
19 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
28 Dec 2017 Editorially accepted
11 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12913-017-2823-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement