Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Identifying gaps in the practices of rural health extension workers in Ethiopia: a task analysis study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Mar 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
19 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - Firew Ayalew Desta
Resubmission - Version 2
19 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lee Bone
15 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizeus Rutebemberwa
16 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Tibenderana
12 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Firew Ayalew Desta
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizeus Rutebemberwa
9 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Firew Ayalew Desta
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Firew Ayalew Desta
Resubmission - Version 5
13 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
14 Dec 2017 Editorially accepted
20 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12913-017-2804-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement