This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Academic detailers’ and general practitioners’ views and experiences of their academic detailing visits to improve the quality of analgesic use: process evaluation alongside a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 16 May 2017
Accepted: 13 December 2017
Published: 21 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|16 May 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Simon Holliday|
|23 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Neil Spike|
|29 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Sibyl Anthierens|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Sibyl Anthierens|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|21 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12913-017-2797-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.