Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Satisfaction of doctors with their training: evidence from UK

BMC Health Services ResearchBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:851

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2792-0

Received: 8 February 2017

Accepted: 12 December 2017

Published: 29 December 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
19 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Victoria Brazil
18 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carol Stalker
16 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Simon Gregory
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Simon Gregory
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Simon Gregory
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
7 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Simon Gregory
Resubmission - Version 5
7 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
12 Dec 2017 Editorially accepted
29 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12913-017-2792-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Health Education England, London, England
(2)
Homerton College, Cambridge, England
(3)
Department of Economics and Management, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy

Advertisement