This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A systematic review of the economic impact of rapid diagnostic tests for dengue
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 9 May 2017
Accepted: 11 December 2017
Published: 29 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 May 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yen Wei Lim|
|20 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Annelies Wilder-Smith|
|3 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Jacqueline Kyungah Lim|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Jacqueline Kyungah Lim|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|29 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12913-017-2789-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.