This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
It’s hard to play ball: A qualitative study of knowledge exchange and silo effects in public health
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 1 June 2016
Accepted: 28 November 2017
Published: 2 January 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|1 Jun 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judith Bernstein|
|1 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - C. Eduardo Siqueira|
|9 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Rebecca Johnson|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judith Bernstein|
|27 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Rebecca Johnson|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|2 Jan 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12913-017-2770-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.