Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

It’s hard to play ball: A qualitative study of knowledge exchange and silo effects in public health

BMC Health Services ResearchBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201818:1

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2770-6

Received: 1 June 2016

Accepted: 28 November 2017

Published: 2 January 2018

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Jun 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Judith Bernstein
1 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - C. Eduardo Siqueira
9 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Rebecca Johnson
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Judith Bernstein
27 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Rebecca Johnson
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
28 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
2 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12913-017-2770-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West Midlands, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
(2)
Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

Advertisement