This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The development, implementation and evaluation of clinical pathways for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Saskatchewan: protocol for an interrupted times series evaluation
- Thomas Rotter1, 2,
- Christopher Plishka1Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
- Mohammed Rashaad Hansia3,
- Donna Goodridge4, 5,
- Erika Penz4,
- Leigh Kinsman6,
- Adegboyega Lawal1,
- Sheryl O’Quinn3,
- Nancy Buchan3,
- Patricia Comfort3,
- Prakesh Patel3,
- Sheila Anderson3,
- Tanya Winkel3,
- Rae Lynn Lang3 and
- Darcy D. Marciniuk4, 5
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 12 May 2017
Accepted: 21 November 2017
Published: 28 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|12 May 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Rotter|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|28 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12913-017-2750-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.