Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the datasets used for analyses

From: Do effects of common case-mix adjusters on patient experiences vary across patient groups?

      

Age (%)

Self-rated health (%)

Education (%)

Gender (%)

Patient group

N units

N patients

Response

Global rating (M)

SD

<45

45 / 64

> = 65

Poor / fair

Good / excellent

Low

Medium

High

Male

Ambulance (2013)

132

1632

30%

9.00

1.13

14.58

35.78

49.63

38.79

61.21

31.99

44.85

23.16

49.08

Asthma (2008)

 

385

45%

7.00

1.78

36.94

39.58

23.48

40.36

59.64

38.83

42.55

18.62

40.27

Audiology care (2013)

 

1669

33%

8.19

1.23

37.89

34.53

27.58

13.80

86.20

17.68

48.04

34.28

36.19

Benign breast abnormality (2008)

 

918

64%

7.77

1.22

32.50

52.34

15.16

14.05

85.95

33.18

48.22

18.60

0.00

COPD (2009)

 

271

55%

7.67

1.59

6.77

43.61

49.62

60.69

39.31

56.49

33.59

9.92

49.62

Cancer care (2013)

 

712

50%

8.15

1.27

5.77

40.42

53.80

28.51

71.49

32.70

46.66

20.64

46.33

Cataract surgery (2010)

648

18,558

72%a

8.88

1.14

0.66

17.14

82.21

20.19

79.81

48.00

37.78

14.22

43.17

Cerebrovasculair accident (2011)

 

778

41%

8.13

1.49

4.82

32.07

63.10

46.27

53.73

47.43

38.34

14.23

49.35

Chronic Skin Disease (2013)

82

1109

29%

7.99

1.37

19.15

32.25

48.60

28.49

71.51

35.85

47.26

16.89

41.61

Chronic pain (2013)

 

820

40%

7.74

1.58

17.22

59.16

23.62

65.88

34.12

13.52

50.99

35.48

27.45

Diabetes (2009)

186

4242

72%a

8.36

1.57

3.14

36.68

60.18

38.99

61.01

61.15

33.45

5.40

45.12

Emergency department (2013)

268

4601

41%

7.82

1.63

28.62

38.17

33.21

33.45

66.55

26.04

47.91

26.04

48.71

Pharmacie (2009)

77

2845

46%

8.32

1.34

22.54

38.13

39.32

42.90

57.10

42.46

44.93

12.61

35.66

General Practice (2008)

216

5330

48%

8.15

1.28

38.27

37.91

23.82

24.24

75.76

30.84

40.66

28.50

36.98

Heart failure (2010)

 

312

61%

7.99

1.42

4.25

23.20

72.55

57.67

42.33

52.01

38.93

9.06

61.74

Hip- or knee surgery (2010)

293

6195

75%a

8.51

1.26

6.27

61.73

32.00

20.45

79.55

51.01

38.14

10.85

33.93

Home care, cleaning (2012)

434

26,594

70%a

8.37

1.42

2.44

12.08

85.49

74.11

25.89

59.04

34.47

6.50

21.12

Home care, nurses (2010)

237

4883

52%a

8.15

1.30

1.04

6.94

92.01

63.02

36.98

62.00

30.59

7.41

25.89

Hospital care (2009)

348

21,529

55%

7.97

1.45

22.14

31.77

46.09

41.45

58.55

47.99

40.90

11.11

42.55

Malignant breast abnormality (2008)

 

1111

68%

8.19

1.35

12.10

50.32

37.58

24.59

75.41

39.85

45.68

14.47

0.00

Maternal care (2010)

119

1826

52%

8.53

1.55

99.84

0.16

0.00

3.89

96.11

5.81

44.52

49.67

0.00

Maternity centre (2009)

229

1947

32%

7.61

1.10

98.82

1.18

0.00

3.24

96.76

5.88

54.07

40.05

7.07

Mental health ambulatory care (2010)

149

1404

7.60

1.65

55.77

38.32

5.91

33.26

66.74

22.58

50.14

27.28

39.67

Muscle disease hospital (2012)

 

331

57%

7.56

1.70

18.43

48.64

32.93

50.93

49.07

17.33

52.28

30.40

47.43

Nursing home care (2010)

83

13,173

98%a,b

7.81

1.19

0.25

2.92

96.83

55.21

44.79

72.24

22.90

4.86

73.57

Physiotherapy (2009)

195

1635

29%

8.41

1.07

33.76

46.06

20.18

34.07

65.93

20.61

48.62

30.76

38.09

Rehabilitation care (2010)

112

1942

45%

8.22

1.40

12.98

40.01

47.01

37.69

62.31

26.42

49.02

24.56

51.68

Repres. nursing home patients (2010)

102

9410

77%a

7.56

1.32

6.20

67.39

26.40

10.86

89.14

19.13

50.15

30.71

34.90

Repres. of young handicapped (2007)*

258

5283

7.87

1.19

65.26

33.90

0.84

15.13

56.31

28.56

20.91

Rheumatoid arthritis (2007)

 

352

60%

7.85

1.47

9.43

46.86

43.71

54.62

45.38

47.81

42.86

9.33

26.50

Spinal disc herniation (2009)

96

1452

47%a

7.13

1.81

30.92

51.58

17.49

34.23

65.77

32.78

47.87

19.35

50.90

Varicose veins (2009)

150

2329

67%

8.05

1.35

28.65

55.19

16.16

13.66

86.34

29.97

51.41

18.62

17.78

  1. *Self-rated health was not available in this dataset
  2. aThe data collection was fragmented across various organizations and did not provide a response percentage. The response percentage shown is based on an earlier data collection in the same setting
  3. bData were collected through interviews in nursing homes