Skip to main content

Table 5 Indicators of quality of working life predicting compassion fatigue, burnout, and compassion satisfactiona

From: How are compassion fatigue, burnout, and compassion satisfaction affected by quality of working life? Findings from a survey of mental health staff in Italy

 

Compassion fatigue (N = 362)

Burnout (N = 360)

Compassion satisfaction (N = 360)

Adjusted R2 = 0.15

Adjusted R2 = 0.25

Adjusted R2 = 0.18

Coeff.

95% CI

Coeff.

95% CI

Coeff.

95% CI

Ergonomic problems

1.063

(0.278, 1.848)

1.228

(0.438, 2.017)

0.160

(−1.142, 1.463)

Job complexity

0.501

(−0.298, 1.300)

–

–

–

–

Trust

−0.461

(−1.202, 0.279)

−1.210

(−2.038, −0.382)

0.454

(−0.907, 1.816)

Autonomy

–

–

−0.241

(−0.955, 0.474)

0.173

(−1.011, 1.356)

Participation

–

–

−0.021

(−0.869, 0.828)

−0.010

(−1.400, 1.380)

Perceived quality of meetings

−0.618

(−1.360, 0.123)

−0.726

(−1.550, 0.098)

1.873

(0.529, 3.217)

Organizational commitment

–

–

−0.295

(−1.113, 0.523)

1.328

(−0.030, 2.687)

Impact of work on life

0.683

(0.175, 1.191)

0.692

(0.194, 1.190)

−0.685

(−1.507, 0.137)

Impact of life on work

0.622

(0.141, 1.103)

–

–

–

–

Perceived need of training (Yes vs. No)

–

–

–

–

3.138

(0.171, 6.106)

Perceived risks for the future

 Some risks vs. No risks

0.818

(−0.629, 2.265)

1.589

(−0.010, 3.189)

−3.003

(−5.559, −0.446)

 Many risks vs. No risks

1.261

(−0.233, 2.755)

2.826

(1.112, 4.541)

−3.170

(−5.880, −0.460)

Opinion of current salary

 Sufficient vs. Insufficient

–

–

−0.035

(−1.129, 1.058)

–

–

 Good vs. Insufficient

–

–

−0.419

(−1.836, 0.997)

–

–

  1. aMultiple regressions controlling for socio-demographic and occupational variables. Bold indicates effect size with statistical significance