Skip to main content

Table 5 Effects of new distribution arrangements on received rates

From: Distribution of essential medicines to primary care institutions in Hubei of China: effects of centralized procurement arrangements

Variable Urban Rural
β p 95%CI β p 95%CI
lower upper lower upper
Medicine-tied model
 Intervention (vs control) 9.66 0.05 0.14 19.19 −13.10 0.00 −18.34 −7.86
 Time (pre-post) −7.08 0.01 −12.02 −2.13 2.93 0.02 0.42 5.43
 Intervention*Time 6.40 0.09 −1.06 13.86 −7.89 0.00 −11.36 −4.43
Recipient-tied model
 Intervention (vs control) −9.17 0.03 −17.50 −0.84
 Time (pre-post) 1.83 0.30 −1.63 5.29
 Intervention*Time −19.65 0.00 −24.67 −14.63
Recipient-medicine-tied model
 Intervention (vs control) −3.68 0.42 −12.57 5.22
 Time (pre-post) −0.26 0.91 −4.93 4.41
 Intervention*Time 3.37 0.32 −3.31 10.05
  1. Note: other variables in the models were not shown in the Table; Bold indicates effect size with statistical significance