This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A path analysis study of factors influencing hospital staff perceptions of quality of care factors associated with patient satisfaction and patient experience
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 28 October 2015
Accepted: 9 November 2017
Published: 16 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|28 Oct 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rob Haley|
|23 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Junya Zhu|
|26 May 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Sandra Leggat|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 May 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rob Haley|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|16 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12913-017-2718-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.