|Domains||Sub- domains||Sub-domain questions|
|Coherence||Differentiation||How does revalidation differ from usual ways of working?|
|Communal Specification||Do participants have a shared understanding of the purpose of revalidation?|
|Individual Specification||How does revalidation affect the work for participants?|
|Internalisation||Can participants see the potential value of revalidation?|
|Cognitive participation||Initiation||Are there key people who drive the revalidation forward and get others involved?|
|Legitimation||Do participants believe that being involved in revalidation is a legitimate part of their role?|
|Enrolment||Are participants open to working with others in new ways for the purposed of revalidation?|
|Activation||Are participants willing to support revalidation?|
|Collective action||Interactional workability||Can participants easily integrate revalidation into their existing work?|
Does being involved in revalidation disrupt working relationships?|
Do participants have confidence in other people’s ability to carry out revalidation?
|Skill set workability||
Do participants believe work is assigned to those with appropriate skills to carry out revalidation?|
Is sufficient training provided to enable participants to enact revalidation?
Are sufficient resources available to support revalidation?|
Do management adequately support revalidation?
|Reflexive monitoring||Systemisation||Are participants aware of reports about the effects of the revalidation?|
|Communal appraisal||Do participants agree that revalidation is worthwhile?|
|Individual appraisal||Do participants value the effects revalidation has on their work?|
Is feedback about revalidation used to improve it in the future?|
Do participants modify how they work with revalidation?