From: The implementation of medical revalidation: an assessment using normalisation process theory
How does revalidation differ from usual ways of working?
Do participants have a shared understanding of the purpose of revalidation?
How does revalidation affect the work for participants?
Can participants see the potential value of revalidation?
Are there key people who drive the revalidation forward and get others involved?
Do participants believe that being involved in revalidation is a legitimate part of their role?
Are participants open to working with others in new ways for the purposed of revalidation?
Are participants willing to support revalidation?
Can participants easily integrate revalidation into their existing work?
Does being involved in revalidation disrupt working relationships?
Do participants have confidence in other people’s ability to carry out revalidation?
Skill set workability
Do participants believe work is assigned to those with appropriate skills to carry out revalidation?
Is sufficient training provided to enable participants to enact revalidation?
Are sufficient resources available to support revalidation?
Do management adequately support revalidation?
Are participants aware of reports about the effects of the revalidation?
Do participants agree that revalidation is worthwhile?
Do participants value the effects revalidation has on their work?
Is feedback about revalidation used to improve it in the future?
Do participants modify how they work with revalidation?