This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The implementation of medical revalidation: an assessment using normalisation process theory
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 21 October 2016
Accepted: 7 November 2017
Published: 21 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|21 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ann Griffin|
|13 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Inger Lindberg|
|27 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Abigail Tazzyman|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ann Griffin|
|10 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Inger Lindberg|
|21 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Abigail Tazzyman|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|21 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12913-017-2710-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.